{"id":1247,"date":"2026-05-19T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-19T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/?p=1247"},"modified":"2026-05-20T11:36:14","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T08:36:14","slug":"monitorul-oficial-nr-417-18-v-2026-publica-trei-decizii-ale-curtii-constitutionale-cu-efecte-directe-si-un-ordin-minist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/monitorul-oficial-nr-417-18-v-2026-publica-trei-decizii-ale-curtii-constitutionale-cu-efecte-directe-si-un-ordin-minist\/","title":{"rendered":"CCR \u00eencheie disputa: Legea 544\/2001 r\u0103m\u00e2ne constitu\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i valabil\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>CE S-A MODIFICAT<\/h3>\n<p>Monitorul Oficial nr. 417\/18.V.2026 public\u0103 trei decizii ale Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale cu efecte directe \u0219i un ordin ministerial nou.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decizia CCR nr. 554\/4 noiembrie 2025<\/strong> respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a <strong>art. 22 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 544\/2001<\/strong> privind liberul acces la informa\u021biile de interes public.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decizia CCR nr. 25\/15 ianuarie 2026<\/strong> respinge ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103 excep\u021bia privind sintagma \u201eprin \u00eencheiere definitiv\u0103&#8221; din <strong>art. 906 alin. (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103<\/strong>, \u00een redactarea anterioar\u0103 modific\u0103rii aduse prin Legea nr. 310\/2018.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ordinul ministrului mediului nr. 869\/2026<\/strong> aprob\u0103 Procedura privind \u00eenregistrarea \u0219i fixarea cu mijloace foto-audio-video din dotarea <strong>G\u0103rzii Na\u021bionale de Mediu<\/strong>, inclusiv stocarea \u0219i accesarea \u00eenregistr\u0103rilor.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<h3>CE \u00ceNSEAMN\u0102 PRACTIC<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Decizia nr. 554<\/strong> confirm\u0103 c\u0103 instan\u021ba poate obliga autoritatea public\u0103 \u201es\u0103 furnizeze informa\u021biile de interes public solicitate \u0219i s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 daune morale \u0219i\/sau patrimoniale&#8221; (art. 22 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 544\/2001). Instan\u021ba <strong>nu poate<\/strong> ordona declan\u0219area cercet\u0103rii disciplinare a func\u021bionarului vinovat \u2014 aceasta r\u0103m\u00e2ne exclusiv la latitudinea angajatorului public.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decizia nr. 25<\/strong> confirm\u0103 c\u0103 \u00eencheierea prin care instan\u021ba fixeaz\u0103 suma definitiv\u0103 datorat\u0103 cu titlu de penalit\u0103\u021bi este <strong>definitiv\u0103 \u0219i nu poate fi atacat\u0103 cu apel<\/strong> (art. 906 alin. (4) CPC). Singura cale disponibil\u0103 debitorului este contesta\u021bia la executare, prin care \u201epenalitatea va putea fi \u00eenl\u0103turat\u0103 ori redus\u0103&#8230; dac\u0103 debitorul execut\u0103 obliga\u021bia prev\u0103zut\u0103 \u00een titlul executoriu \u0219i dovede\u0219te existen\u021ba unor motive temeinice&#8221; (art. 906 alin. (5) CPC).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ordinul nr. 869<\/strong> instituie cadrul prin care inspectorii GNM pot \u00eenregistra activit\u0103\u021bile de control cu mijloace foto-audio-video din dotare \u0219i le pot stoca \u0219i accesa.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<h3>CINE E AFECTAT<\/h3>\n<li>Orice persoan\u0103 sau firm\u0103 care solicit\u0103 informa\u021bii de interes public \u0219i se confrunt\u0103 cu refuzul autorit\u0103\u021bilor \u2014 <strong>Decizia nr. 554<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Debitori supu\u0219i execut\u0103rii silite a obliga\u021biilor de a face\/a nu face cu penalit\u0103\u021bi aplicate conform art. 906 CPC \u2014 <strong>Decizia nr. 25<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Persoane juridice supuse inspec\u021biilor <strong>G\u0103rzii Na\u021bionale de Mediu<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>Ordinul nr. 869<\/strong><\/li>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<h3>CE TREBUIE F\u0102CUT<\/h3>\n<p>| Situa\u021bie | Ac\u021biune | Termen |<br \/>\n|&#8211;|&#8211;|&#8211;|<br \/>\n| Refuz furnizare informa\u021bii publice | Reclama\u021bie la conduc\u0103torul institu\u021biei, apoi pl\u00e2ngere la tribunal (art. 21 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 544\/2001) | <strong>30 de zile<\/strong> de la luarea la cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 |<br \/>\n| Penalit\u0103\u021bi de executare silit\u0103 | Contesta\u021bie la executare (art. 906 alin. (5) CPC) \u2014 nu apel | La data execut\u0103rii |<br \/>\n| Inspec\u021bii GNM | Adaptarea la procedura de \u00eenregistrare foto-audio-video | De la 18 mai 2026 |<\/p>\n<p>Deciziile CCR sunt <strong>definitive \u0219i general obligatorii<\/strong> de la data public\u0103rii \u00een Monitorul Oficial.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p><em>Analiz\u0103 generat\u0103 automat din Monitorul Oficial \u2014 50.ro AI Platform.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CE S-A MODIFICAT Monitorul Oficial nr. 417\/18.V.2026 public\u0103 trei decizii ale Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale cu efecte directe \u0219i un ordin ministerial nou. Decizia CCR nr. 554\/4 noiembrie 2025 respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a art. 22 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 544\/2001 privind liberul acces la informa\u021biile de interes public. Decizia CCR nr. 25\/15 ianuarie &#8230; <a title=\"CCR \u00eencheie disputa: Legea 544\/2001 r\u0103m\u00e2ne constitu\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i valabil\u0103\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/monitorul-oficial-nr-417-18-v-2026-publica-trei-decizii-ale-curtii-constitutionale-cu-efecte-directe-si-un-ordin-minist\/\" aria-label=\"Cite\u0219te mai multe despre CCR \u00eencheie disputa: Legea 544\/2001 r\u0103m\u00e2ne constitu\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i valabil\u0103\">Cite\u0219te mai mult<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1247","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ghiduri-juridice","category-monitorul-oficial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1247","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1247"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1247\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1265,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1247\/revisions\/1265"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}