{"id":1383,"date":"2026-05-28T17:36:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T14:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/?p=1383"},"modified":"2026-05-29T11:43:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T08:43:11","slug":"m-o-nr-450-27-05-2026-publica-patru-acte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/m-o-nr-450-27-05-2026-publica-patru-acte\/","title":{"rendered":"Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 respinge excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate la Codul penal"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>CE S-A MODIFICAT<\/h3>\n<p>M.O. nr. 450\/27.05.2026 public\u0103 patru acte:<\/p>\n<li><strong>Decizia CCR nr. 453\/16.10.2025<\/strong>: Respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a art. 377 alin. (4) \u0219i art. 386 alin. (1) raportat la art. 421 pct. 2 lit. a) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, \u00een redactarea anterioar\u0103 Legii nr. 201\/2023.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Decizia CCR nr. 487\/21.10.2025<\/strong>: Respinge ca devenit\u0103 inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia privind art. 44 alin. (3) din OUG nr. 80\/2013 \u0219i respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia privind art. 45 alin. (1) din aceea\u0219i ordonan\u021b\u0103.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Decizia Prim-ministrului nr. 190\/27.05.2026<\/strong>: Numirea dlui Vajda Zsombor \u00een func\u021bia de vicepre\u0219edinte, cu rang de secretar de stat, al Autorit\u0103\u021bii Electorale Permanente, pentru un mandat de 8 ani.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Decizia Prim-ministrului nr. 191\/27.05.2026<\/strong>: Declasificarea anexei la Decizia prim-ministrului nr. 350\/2022 privind constituirea Comisiei pentru examinarea investi\u021biilor str\u0103ine directe CEISD.<\/li>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<h3>CE \u00ceNSEAMN\u0102 PRACTIC<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Decizia 453<\/strong>: CCR a refuzat s\u0103 analizeze fondul, constat\u00e2nd c\u0103 autoarea excep\u021biei nu a formulat critici de neconstitu\u021bionalitate, ci a contestat modul de aplicare a legii \u2014 competen\u021b\u0103 exclusiv\u0103 a instan\u021belor de judecat\u0103 (par. 14-16). Regulile privind schimbarea \u00eencadr\u0103rii juridice r\u0103m\u00e2n neschimbate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decizia 487<\/strong>: Art. 44 alin. (3) din OUG nr. 80\/2013 este constitu\u021bional exclusiv dac\u0103 instan\u021ba aplic\u0103 principiul disponibilit\u0103\u021bii \u2014 adic\u0103 verific\u0103 dac\u0103 titularul ajutorului public judiciar e\u0219alonat mai dore\u0219te continuarea judec\u0103\u021bii, \u00eenainte de emiterea titlului executoriu pentru taxa de timbru (par. 19-20, cu trimitere la Decizia nr. 669\/3.12.2024). Cei cu procese \u00een curs care au beneficiat de e\u0219alonare pot invoca aceast\u0103 interpretare.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decizia 191<\/strong>: Autorit\u0103\u021bile care de\u021bin exemplare ale anexei CEISD au obliga\u021bia s\u0103 suprime marcajele de clasificare \u0219i s\u0103 scoat\u0103 documentele de sub regimul informa\u021biilor clasificate (art. unic alin. (2)).<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<h3>CINE E AFECTAT<\/h3>\n<li>Justi\u021biabili cu ajutor public judiciar e\u0219alonat \u0219i instan\u021bele civile (Decizia 487)<\/li>\n<li>Inculpa\u021bi \u0219i ap\u0103r\u0103tori \u00een cauze penale cu schimbare de \u00eencadrare juridic\u0103 (Decizia 453)<\/li>\n<li>Autoritatea Electoral\u0103 Permanent\u0103 (Decizia 190)<\/li>\n<li>Autorit\u0103\u021bi \u0219i institu\u021bii publice cu exemplare ale anexei CEISD (Decizia 191)<\/li>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<h3>CE TREBUIE F\u0102CUT<\/h3>\n<p>| Destinatar | Ac\u021biune | Temei |<br \/>\n|&#8211;|&#8211;|&#8211;|<br \/>\n| Instan\u021be civile | Aplic\u0103 principiul disponibilit\u0103\u021bii la ajutor public judiciar e\u0219alonat | Decizia CCR 487, par. 19-20 |<br \/>\n| Autorit\u0103\u021bi cu anexa CEISD | Suprim\u0103 marcajele de clasificare de \u00eendat\u0103 | Decizia 191, art. unic alin. (2) |<br \/>\n| Inculpa\u021bi cu cauze penale \u00een curs | Verific\u0103 dac\u0103 schimbarea de \u00eencadrare a fost pus\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bie conform art. 377 alin. (4) \u0219i art. 386 alin. (1) | Decizia CCR 453 |<\/p>\n<p>Nu exist\u0103 termene de conformare expres stabilite; Decizia 190 intr\u0103 \u00een vigoare de la data public\u0103rii (27.05.2026), iar Decizia 191 produce efecte imediat.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p><em>Analiz\u0103 generat\u0103 automat din Monitorul Oficial \u2014 50.ro AI Platform.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CE S-A MODIFICAT M.O. nr. 450\/27.05.2026 public\u0103 patru acte: Decizia CCR nr. 453\/16.10.2025: Respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a art. 377 alin. (4) \u0219i art. 386 alin. (1) raportat la art. 421 pct. 2 lit. a) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, \u00een redactarea anterioar\u0103 Legii nr. 201\/2023. Decizia CCR nr. 487\/21.10.2025: Respinge ca devenit\u0103 &#8230; <a title=\"Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 respinge excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate la Codul penal\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/m-o-nr-450-27-05-2026-publica-patru-acte\/\" aria-label=\"Cite\u0219te mai multe despre Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 respinge excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate la Codul penal\">Cite\u0219te mai mult<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ghiduri-juridice","category-monitorul-oficial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1383"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1415,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383\/revisions\/1415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}