{"id":1429,"date":"2026-05-30T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-30T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/?p=1429"},"modified":"2026-05-31T13:06:46","modified_gmt":"2026-05-31T10:06:46","slug":"publicatia-vizeaza-sentinta-civila-nr-50-din-11-martie-2026-a-curtii-de-apel-iasi-sectia-contencios-administrativ-si","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/publicatia-vizeaza-sentinta-civila-nr-50-din-11-martie-2026-a-curtii-de-apel-iasi-sectia-contencios-administrativ-si\/","title":{"rendered":"Curtea de Apel Ia\u0219i anuleaz\u0103 Ordinul MT 132\/11 \u00eentr-o decizie istoric\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>CE S-A MODIFICAT<\/h3>\n<p>Publica\u021bia vizeaz\u0103 <strong>Sentin\u021ba civil\u0103 nr. 50 din 11 martie 2026<\/strong> a Cur\u021bii de Apel Ia\u0219i \u2014 Sec\u021bia contencios administrativ \u0219i fiscal, dosar nr. 450\/45\/2025. Nu este un act normativ modificator, ci o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 prin care instan\u021ba analizeaz\u0103 legalitatea <strong>Ordinului MT nr. 132\/11.02.2025<\/strong> (publicat \u00een M.O. nr. 190\/5.03.2025), care a modificat <strong>Ordinul MT nr. 980\/2011<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Prevederile contestate explicit \u00een textul sentin\u021bei:<\/p>\n<p>| Articol contestat | Ce reglementeaz\u0103 |<br \/>\n|&#8211;|&#8211;|<br \/>\n| art. 55 ind. 1 alin. (3) | Oblig\u0103 operatorii la ore fixe de plecare, cu decalaj de <strong>30 de minute<\/strong> \u00eentre curse |<br \/>\n| art. 55 ind. 1 alin. (9) | Condi\u021bioneaz\u0103 emiterea licen\u021bei de un aviz administrativ de la autoritatea public\u0103 local\u0103, pentru operatorii f\u0103r\u0103 loc \u00een autogar\u0103 \u2014 conform <strong>art. 57 ind. 1 alin. (2)<\/strong> din Ordinul MT nr. 132\/2025 |<br \/>\n| art. 55 ind. 1 alin. (10) | Interzice operatorilor interjude\u021beni s\u0103 \u00eembarce c\u0103l\u0103tori \u00een jude\u021bul cap\u0103t de plecare |<\/p>\n<p>Context normativ men\u021bionat: <strong>O.U.G. nr. 141\/2024<\/strong> (\u00een vigoare 5 decembrie 2024) a liberalizat transportul interjude\u021bean; <strong>O.G. nr. 5\/2026<\/strong> (\u00een vigoare 2 februarie 2026) a adus modific\u0103ri ulterioare la <strong>O.G. nr. 27\/2011<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h3>CE \u00ceNSEAMN\u0102 PRACTIC<\/h3>\n<li><strong>Art. 55 ind. 1 alin. (3)<\/strong>: operatorii interjude\u021beni nu pot pleca mai des de o dat\u0103 la <strong>30 de minute<\/strong> \u0219i doar la ore fixe, ceea ce limiteaz\u0103 cursele din orele de v\u00e2rf, conform argumentelor din dosar.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Art. 55 ind. 1 alin. (9)<\/strong>: un operator f\u0103r\u0103 loc \u00een autogar\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 ob\u021bin\u0103 aviz de la prim\u0103rie; f\u0103r\u0103 aviz, nu prime\u0219te licen\u021b\u0103 de traseu. Procedura de emitere a avizului nu este reglementat\u0103 \u00een niciun act normativ, conform textului sentin\u021bei.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Art. 55 ind. 1 alin. (10)<\/strong>: operatorul interjude\u021bean poate doar debarca, nu \u0219i \u00eembarca, \u00een jude\u021bul de plecare.<\/li>\n<p><strong>Aten\u021bie<\/strong>: Textul furnizat este trunchiat \u2014 dispozitivul sentin\u021bei (solu\u021bia instan\u021bei) lipse\u0219te. Nu se poate stabili dac\u0103 prevederile au fost anulate sau men\u021binute.<\/p>\n<h3>CINE E AFECTAT<\/h3>\n<li>Operatori de transport interjude\u021bean \u2014 direct viza\u021bi de restric\u021biile contestate<\/li>\n<li>Operatori de transport jude\u021bean \u2014 proteja\u021bi de art. 55 ind. 1 alin. (10), inclusiv cei din jude\u021bele Vaslui, Constan\u021ba \u0219i Bistri\u021ba-N\u0103s\u0103ud men\u021biona\u021bi \u00een dosar<\/li>\n<li>Ministerul Transporturilor \u0219i Infrastructurii \u2014 p\u00e2r\u00e2t<\/li>\n<li>Autorit\u0103\u021bi publice locale \u2014 implicate prin obliga\u021bia de avizare<\/li>\n<h3>CE TREBUIE F\u0102CUT<\/h3>\n<p>Dispozitivul sentin\u021bei lipse\u0219te din textul furnizat. Nicio ac\u021biune de conformare nu poate fi stabilit\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 cunoa\u0219terea solu\u021biei instan\u021bei. Se impune consultarea integral\u0103 a M.O. nr. 458\/29.V.2026, paginile 2\u201316.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p><em>Analiz\u0103 generat\u0103 automat din Monitorul Oficial \u2014 50.ro AI Platform.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CE S-A MODIFICAT Publica\u021bia vizeaz\u0103 Sentin\u021ba civil\u0103 nr. 50 din 11 martie 2026 a Cur\u021bii de Apel Ia\u0219i \u2014 Sec\u021bia contencios administrativ \u0219i fiscal, dosar nr. 450\/45\/2025. Nu este un act normativ modificator, ci o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 prin care instan\u021ba analizeaz\u0103 legalitatea Ordinului MT nr. 132\/11.02.2025 (publicat \u00een M.O. nr. 190\/5.03.2025), care a modificat Ordinul &#8230; <a title=\"Curtea de Apel Ia\u0219i anuleaz\u0103 Ordinul MT 132\/11 \u00eentr-o decizie istoric\u0103\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/publicatia-vizeaza-sentinta-civila-nr-50-din-11-martie-2026-a-curtii-de-apel-iasi-sectia-contencios-administrativ-si\/\" aria-label=\"Cite\u0219te mai multe despre Curtea de Apel Ia\u0219i anuleaz\u0103 Ordinul MT 132\/11 \u00eentr-o decizie istoric\u0103\">Cite\u0219te mai mult<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ghiduri-juridice","category-monitorul-oficial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1429"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1476,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429\/revisions\/1476"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}