{"id":252,"date":"2026-04-06T06:04:30","date_gmt":"2026-04-06T03:04:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/mo-mo-pi-257-2026-act-1-decizia-cc-nr-610-11-11-2025-curtea-constitutionala-a-respins-ca-i\/"},"modified":"2026-04-09T04:15:24","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T01:15:24","slug":"mo-mo-pi-257-2026-act-1-decizia-cc-nr-610-11-11-2025-curtea-constitutionala-a-respins-ca-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/mo-mo-pi-257-2026-act-1-decizia-cc-nr-610-11-11-2025-curtea-constitutionala-a-respins-ca-i\/","title":{"rendered":"Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 pune punct controversei ajutoarelor de stat 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"

CE S-A MODIFICAT<\/h3>\n

Act 1 \u2014 Decizia CC nr. 610\/11.11.2025:<\/strong> Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a respins ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a dispozi\u021biilor art. 6 alin. (6) din OUG nr. 132\/2020<\/strong> (sprijin telemunc\u0103 \u2014 2.500 lei\/telesalariat). Curtea a constatat c\u0103 autoarea ridic\u0103 exclusiv probleme de interpretare \u0219i aplicare, nu de constitu\u021bionalitate.<\/p>\n

Act 2 \u2014 Decizia CC nr. 678\/25.11.2025:<\/strong> Curtea a admis<\/strong> excep\u021bia \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 art. 32 teza \u00eent\u00e2i din Legea nr. 350\/2001<\/strong> (forma anterioar\u0103 modific\u0103rii prin Legea nr. 289\/2006) este neconstitu\u021bional<\/strong>, prin identitate normativ\u0103 cu textul declarat deja neconstitu\u021bional prin Decizia nr. 49\/4.02.2020.<\/p>\n

Act 3 \u2014 Ordinul nr. 93\/23.03.2026:<\/strong> Ministerul Agriculturii a aprobat Sistemul de sanc\u021biuni pentru interven\u021bia DR-08 \u201e\u00cemp\u0103duriri \u2014 \u00eentre\u021binerea \u0219i \u00eengrijirea suprafe\u021belor \u00eemp\u0103durite”<\/strong> din Planul strategic PAC 2023-2027, aplicabil cererilor de plat\u0103 depuse \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu anul 2025<\/strong> (art. 2).<\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

CE \u00ceNSEAMN\u0102 PRACTIC<\/h3>\n

Decizia 610:<\/strong> Nicio schimbare. Condi\u021bia de \u00eenregistrare \u00een ReviSal anterior expir\u0103rii termenului legal<\/strong> r\u0103m\u00e2ne obligatorie pentru acordarea sprijinului de 2.500 lei\/telesalariat (art. 6 alin. 6 OUG 132\/2020).<\/p>\n

Decizia 678:<\/strong> Actele administrative emise \u00een baza art. 32 teza \u00eent\u00e2i Legea 350\/2001 \u00een forma din 2005 (aprob\u0103ri PUZ\/PUD cu derog\u0103ri de la documenta\u021biile de urbanism aprobate, f\u0103r\u0103 criterii obiective) pot fi contestate cu succes \u00een instan\u021b\u0103, dat fiind c\u0103 norma aplicat\u0103 \u0219i-a produs efecte \u00een condi\u021bii de neconstitu\u021bionalitate.<\/p>\n

Ordinul 93:<\/strong> Introduce 4 categorii de sanc\u021biuni aplicate secven\u021bial<\/strong>: supradeclarare suprafe\u021be \u2192 nerespectare criterii eligibilitate \u2192 nedeclarare suprafe\u021be agricole \u2192 nerespectare condi\u021bionalitate. Suprafe\u021bele supradeclarate cu peste 20%<\/strong> din suprafa\u021ba determinat\u0103 atrag excluderea total\u0103 de la plat\u0103 pentru grupa respectiv\u0103 (Cap. II, Sec\u021b. 1, pct. 1 alin. 3). Procentul de reu\u0219it\u0103 sub 40%<\/strong> la nivel de u.a. atrage recuperarea tuturor sumelor acordate anterior, inclusiv pentru \u00eenfiin\u021bare \u0219i \u00eemprejmuire (Tabel, nr. crt. 11).<\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

CINE E AFECTAT<\/h3>\n
  • Decizia 678:<\/strong> Persoane fizice\/juridice care au ob\u021binut aprob\u0103ri de derogare de la documenta\u021bii de urbanism \u00een perioada 2005 (anterior Legii nr. 289\/2006), \u00een litigii pe rolul instan\u021belor.<\/li>\n
  • Ordinul 93:<\/strong> Beneficiarii sM8.1 din PNDR 2014-2020 care depun cereri de plat\u0103 DR-08 din 2025<\/strong>, verifica\u021bi de APIA \u0219i Garda Forestier\u0103.<\/li>\n

    –<\/p>\n

    CE TREBUIE F\u0102CUT<\/h3>\n
  • Beneficiari DR-08:<\/strong> Verifica\u021bi procentul de reu\u0219it\u0103 al planta\u021biei \u00eenainte de depunerea cererii de plat\u0103; asigura\u021bi lucr\u0103rile prin persoane atestate conform Ordinului nr. 1.763\/2015; men\u021bine\u021bi \u00eemprejmuirea func\u021bional\u0103 \u2014 deteriorarea peste 40% din perimetru<\/strong> atrage recuperarea integral\u0103 a sprijinului pentru \u00eemprejmuire (Cap. II, Sec\u021b. 2, pct. 6).<\/li>\n
  • Litigan\u021bi \u00een urbanism:<\/strong> Dac\u0103 ave\u021bi pe rol contesta\u021bii privind acte administrative din 2005 bazate pe art. 32 teza \u00eent\u00e2i Legea 350\/2001, invoca\u021bi Decizia CC nr. 678\/2025 \u00een fa\u021ba instan\u021bei.<\/li>\n\n

    Analiz\u0103 generat\u0103 automat din Monitorul Oficial \u2014 50.ro AI Platform.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    CE S-A MODIFICAT Act 1 \u2014 Decizia CC nr. 610\/11.11.2025: Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a respins ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a dispozi\u021biilor art. 6 alin. (6) din OUG nr. 132\/2020 (sprijin telemunc\u0103 \u2014 2.500 lei\/telesalariat). Curtea a constatat c\u0103 autoarea ridic\u0103 exclusiv probleme de interpretare \u0219i aplicare, nu de constitu\u021bionalitate. Act 2 \u2014 Decizia CC nr. … Cite\u0219te mai mult<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ghiduri-juridice","category-monitorul-oficial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":616,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252\/revisions\/616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}