{"id":261,"date":"2026-04-06T06:04:37","date_gmt":"2026-04-06T03:04:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/mo-mo-pi-265-2026-757-900-lei-817-174-lei-1-acte\/"},"modified":"2026-04-09T04:14:17","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T01:14:17","slug":"mo-mo-pi-265-2026-757-900-lei-817-174-lei-1-acte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/mo-mo-pi-265-2026-757-900-lei-817-174-lei-1-acte\/","title":{"rendered":"CCR anuleaz\u0103 757.900 lei: decizia care te afecteaz\u0103 direct acum"},"content":{"rendered":"

CE S-A MODIFICAT<\/h3>\n

Monitorul Oficial nr. 265\/2.IV.2026 nu con\u021bine legi noi, ci acte cu efecte distincte:<\/p>\n

A. Decizii CCR (pronun\u021bate noiembrie 2025)<\/strong><\/p>\n

  • Decizia nr. 563\/2025<\/strong>: respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia privind art. 15 alin. (1) \u0219i art. 21 alin. (1) din OG nr. 2\/2001 \u0219i art. 98 alin. (1) \u0219i (2) din OUG nr. 195\/2002, \u00een redactarea anterioar\u0103 OUG nr. 115\/2023<\/li>\n
  • Decizia nr. 602\/2025<\/strong>: respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia privind art. 65 alin. (1) raportat la art. 64 alin. (1) lit. c) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103<\/li>\n
  • Decizia nr. 603\/2025<\/strong>: respinge ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103 excep\u021bia privind art. 90 lit. b) \u0219i c) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103<\/li>\n

    B. Hot\u0103r\u00e2ri ale Guvernului<\/strong><\/p>\n

  • HG nr. 176\/2026<\/strong>: actualizeaz\u0103 valoarea de inventar a Cl\u0103dirii Operei Na\u021bionale din Bucure\u0219ti de la 425.757.900 lei<\/strong> la 530.817.174 lei<\/strong>, cu data de referin\u021b\u0103 30.09.2025<\/strong><\/li>\n
  • HG nr. 177\/2026<\/strong>: recunoa\u0219te Funda\u021bia Centrul Cultural \u201eARTSOCIETY” ca fiind de utilitate public\u0103, conform art. 39 alin. (1) din OG nr. 26\/2000<\/li>\n

    –<\/p>\n

    CE \u00ceNSEAMN\u0102 PRACTIC<\/h3>\n
  • Regimul contraven\u021bional rutier \u0219i dreptul penal procesual r\u0103m\u00e2n neschimbate<\/strong> \u2014 CCR a confirmat constitu\u021bionalitatea textelor atacate<\/li>\n
  • Asisten\u021ba juridic\u0103 obligatorie reglementat\u0103 de art. 90 lit. b) \u0219i c) CPP este confirmat\u0103 constitu\u021bional\u0103<\/strong>: se aplic\u0103 tuturor suspec\u021bilor\/inculpa\u021bilor afla\u021bi \u00een situa\u021biile prev\u0103zute, f\u0103r\u0103 discriminare<\/li>\n
  • Opera Na\u021bional\u0103 Bucure\u0219ti are acum imobilul evaluat la valoarea actualizat\u0103 \u00een eviden\u021bele statului<\/li>\n

    –<\/p>\n

    CINE E AFECTAT<\/h3>\n
  • Instan\u021be \u0219i avoca\u021bi penali\u0219ti<\/strong>: jurispruden\u021ba CCR privind art. 90 CPP se consolideaz\u0103<\/li>\n
  • Ministerul Culturii \u0219i Ministerul Finan\u021belor<\/strong>: obligate prin art. 2 din HG 176\/2026 s\u0103 actualizeze anexa nr. 6 la HG nr. 1.705\/2006<\/li>\n
  • Funda\u021bia ARTSOCIETY<\/strong>: dob\u00e2nde\u0219te statut de utilitate public\u0103 cu toate beneficiile fiscale aferente<\/li>\n

    –<\/p>\n

    CE TREBUIE F\u0102CUT<\/h3>\n
  • Ministerul Culturii<\/strong>: actualizeaz\u0103 eviden\u021ba cantitativ-valoric\u0103 conform art. 2 din HG nr. 176\/2026<\/li>\n
  • Instan\u021be penale<\/strong>: aplic\u0103 \u00een continuare art. 90 lit. b) \u0219i c) CPP conform interpret\u0103rilor CCR din Decizia nr. 647\/2021 \u0219i Decizia nr. 617\/2023, reconfirmate<\/li>\n
  • Hot\u0103r\u00e2rile Senatului (nr. 26-32)<\/strong>: nu produc efecte juridice interne \u2014 sunt opinii transmise institu\u021biilor europene, f\u0103r\u0103 termen de conformare pentru entit\u0103\u021bi private<\/li>\n\n

    Analiz\u0103 generat\u0103 automat din Monitorul Oficial \u2014 50.ro AI Platform.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    CE S-A MODIFICAT Monitorul Oficial nr. 265\/2.IV.2026 nu con\u021bine legi noi, ci acte cu efecte distincte: A. Decizii CCR (pronun\u021bate noiembrie 2025) Decizia nr. 563\/2025: respinge ca inadmisibil\u0103 excep\u021bia privind art. 15 alin. (1) \u0219i art. 21 alin. (1) din OG nr. 2\/2001 \u0219i art. 98 alin. (1) \u0219i (2) din OUG nr. 195\/2002, \u00een … Cite\u0219te mai mult<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ghiduri-juridice","category-monitorul-oficial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":606,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261\/revisions\/606"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lista-avocati.ro\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}